Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:21
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Horoscope for Tuesday, 6/10/25 by Christopher Renstrom - SFGATE
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why does Taylor Swift endorse Harris when Harris supports open borders?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Gut microbiome study links Parkinson's disease to environmental chemicals - Medical Xpress
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why do Democrats never produce a good argument for why Trump was a bad president?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Universe emerged from time, not from space? New theory shows how - Interesting Engineering
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Have you ever had your crush reject you, and then later you all dated and married?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Measles strikes at birth: Six Canadian newborns infected from unvaccinated mothers - Times of India